The maps below show the development of Barton Bingham from 1937 to 1995. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparisons where relevant.
The maps demonstrate how the Barton Bingham area had changed between 1937 and 1995. Overall, the originally intending land had been decreased in size or demolished to make room for household areas and the following necessary services system. Additionally, the transportation system had also been modernly upgraded.
First looking at the 1937 map, the accommodation units was scattered and stood alone in extremely large purposive land. The 1995 version of Barton Bingham had changed drastically with the development of transportation. The old curving road had been reconstructed into a straight road passing through the center of residential neighborhood which was full of detached parallel houses newly built in 1995. In the middle of the road, if you took a left-turn, you could go to the golf course which was newly appeared in the ground of woodland and scrubland. Going through the golf land, a health farm which was converted from a manor house could easily be seen. Following the road till its end, you can behold the leisure complex at the right corner of the road in the 1995 version of Barton Bingham. To make the entertaining complex, the lake had been deceased in size.
Also rooting from the center of Barton Bingham, the railway had been erected in 1991 in surface of the old disused railway line which was running east south of the town. This railway was connected with the road to lead to a hospital which is adjacent to a car park. After 58 years, the marshland in the bottom right-corner of the map had been totally demolished to make room for wildfowl sanctuary. Additionally, the agricultural land was reduced in size to leave a space connecting the services system with the wildfowl sanctuary and build a farm.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... the lake had been deceased in size. Also rooting from the center of Barton Bingh...
^^^^
Line 5, column 489, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'services'' or 'service's'?
Suggestion: services'; service's
...in size to leave a space connecting the services system with the wildfowl sanctuary and ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 965.302439024 150% => OK
No of words: 291.0 196.424390244 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9793814433 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77266992973 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 106.607317073 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539518900344 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 283.868780488 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.324443754 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.78571428571 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134634326665 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568036675557 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626420011435 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983165730584 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228338762033 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 40.7170731707 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.