The maps below show exports of rubber ducks from 2013 to 2017.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph reveals information about rubber ducks, which were exported by three different countries (the USA, Europe, and the UK) over a quarter from 2013 to 2017. The rubber ducks are measured in units per thousand.
Overall, the export of rubber ducks rose in the UK and Europe over the period given, while for the USA, it decreased. At the start of the period, Europe was the most prolific in export, which was replaced by the UK in 2017, and following that, the USA exported the least numbers of ducks in final years.
Moreover the amount of export in Europe, it began at 30000 and slightly climbed up to 35000 in 2014 before plunging dramatically to about 22000 in 2015. At the end of the year, it peaked at 39000. Likewise, 20000 rubber ducks were exported in the first year, after which the figure fluctuated slightly and jumped up to a high of 30000 in 2017.
On the other hand, the export of rubber ducks started in 2013 at about 10000. This figure, which reached a high of just over 13000 a year later, reduced gradually in the final year to approximately 5000 in 2017.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...umbers of ducks in final years. Moreover the amount of export in Europe, it bega...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, likewise, moreover, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64285714286 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27564175514 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520408163265 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7480527688 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.111111111 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19975504358 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933129127271 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597608204036 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13479044835 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046147718594 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.