The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site

This report derives from two pictorial illustrating the current layout of a commercial site on the east of the town Norbiton as well as the planned renovation blueprint of the sector.

Broadly speaking, the whole manufacturing area is aimed to convert into a residential neighborhood with the installment various supporting facilities and residences in the predicted blueprint.

A glance at the graph reveals that, the current roundabout only has two openings and some industries around it. The eastern road from it has a number of factories either side of it. All these industries will be removed. Shops will set up around the rotary and a hospital will be built at the southeast side of it. The eastern road will have housing and playground scattered around it. Eventually, it will lead to a school that is to be constructed at the far east section of the map. In the south, at the junction of the two highways a small rotary will be established.

By contrast, two more openings will be added to the traffic circle. One will go towards northwest where homes will be constructed both at the end and north side of it. Other will pass through the river as a new bridge is to be established which will connect it with homes and roads at the far northern side. As a result, the current country side will be shrinked and shifted at the east side of the map.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, broadly speaking, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 1.00243902439 1197% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1124.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70292887029 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72764840571 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52719665272 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0624975846 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4615384615 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3846153846 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0699494099168 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0293487755989 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425743442407 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0603433806059 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05542141142 0.0819641961636 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, broadly speaking, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 1.00243902439 1197% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1124.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70292887029 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72764840571 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52719665272 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0624975846 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4615384615 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3846153846 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0699494099168 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0293487755989 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425743442407 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0603433806059 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05542141142 0.0819641961636 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.