The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps compare the difference between 1930 and 2010 of Stokeford village.
It is evident that the village of Stokeford altered so much from 1930 to 2010 with fewer spaces for farmland and the notably rise of modern houses.
Stokeford has been seperated into 2 parts by a main road which passed through the centre of the village. On the left hand side of the main road, most of the spaces were farmland and hardly saw a house in the past. Howerver, in 2010, farmland disappeared and there were modern houses with efficient planning of surface instead. The only thing remained in the west of Stokeford was the post office. Next to it, many shops were demolished and replaced by some houses.
With the same trend as the left hand side, farmland on the right hand side of the main road was also removed, these spaces were used to relocate the houses. In 1930, houses were paralleled with main road, but in 2010, they seemed to be at an angle of 90 degrees to the road. Near them, the primary school was expanded, it had two more buildings than before. To the right of this school where the gardens located in 1930 were many houses leaned on main road. Only a small surface of gardens remained, but the large house in it was replaced by retirement home.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54385964912 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19147316484 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535087719298 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6781225393 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3333333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.41666666667 5.23603664747 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150207385628 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626809030369 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586136152175 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122907136914 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472262958336 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.