The maps show the art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrate the transformation of an art gallery in Australia between 1950 and now.
According to the diagram, there was a sculpture in the centre of this art gallery which still exists without any change in size or location between 1950 and now. Similar to that, to the east, the Early European Art room and the Middle European Art room remain the same after this period. Furthermore, in the right-hand corner, the Temporary Exhibition and the Bookshop remain unchanged through this period. Another thing to add is that the Entrance still stands at the bottom of this map.
As can be seen from the diagram, in the top of this map, the Courtyard has disappeared. Moreover, to the northwest of this building, the art school for children has been built up. Besides, the cafe nearby has been reduced in size in order to construct the toilet next to it. In addition, to the north of this app, the Australian Aboriginal Art room has been erected. Also, in the right-hand corner, there was the Australia Art room in 1950. This room has been moved to the northeast of this gallery. Simultaneously, Asian Art has been constructed on the original site of Australia Art room.
Overall, this art gallery witnessed a dramatic change throughout the period shown.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, moreover, so, still, another thing, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1051.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86574074074 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65031234409 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523148148148 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.0188094921 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.8461538462 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6153846154 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170470013715 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765696643986 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080703519609 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14959229782 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.090442145749 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.