The maps show how the ground floor of a certain building has changed over time. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps give information about the concept certain building from 1958 to 2001.
It is clear that, the certain building witness radical change with the most noticeable being the toilet and play area in the entrance.
The certain building was designed an office in 1958 including meeting room, kitchen, assistant’s office, manager office, secretary’s office, toilet and reception area, entrance. The reception directly accessible building and next to toilet. Look at the map in 1958-2000 an apartment, the building have the bathroom and shower replaced to toilet, assistant’s, secretary’s and bathroom 2, living at the top.
While the entrance remain in the bottom, it is become more spacious and go to the entrance we will see the play area in the right and flower on the left and below the flower and office. Meanwhile, compared to the present, today building have few new places ( 5 areas), the gift card, office, two flower areas, play area. Besides, the building in 2001 don’t have relaxing room areas for bedroom or bathroom. Now this place expanded to new places. Bathroom, bedroom, living replaced to play area. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. So, it can be seen that the building in 2000 is modern than 2001.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sent, today building have few new places 5 areas, the gift card, office, two flow...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, look, so, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15094339623 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66777707687 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594339622642 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.8750522138 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174852132801 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766529001586 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110433819611 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115625366426 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371435035362 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sent, today building have few new places 5 areas, the gift card, office, two flow...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, look, so, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15094339623 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66777707687 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594339622642 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.8750522138 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174852132801 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766529001586 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110433819611 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115625366426 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371435035362 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.