The maps show two different plans designed for a conference room

Essay topics:

The maps show two different plans designed for a conference room.

The map illustrates modifications to the layout of an unspecified conference room in two different plans. Overall, it can be seen that the place undergo a complete transformation with various facilities being relocated, replaced or added.
According to plan B, a podium is relocated to roughly in the middle of the room while its position in plan A is now replaced by the morning tea counter instead of staying at the back of the site. Next, the whiteboard is moved next to the podium, closely to the center of the area.
Another major difference to the site in the two plans is the rearrangement of tables and the addition of chairs. The conference room in plan A has 2 tables on each side and there are 3 chairs per table whereas, in plan B, it will be provided 3 additional chairs for each table. the remaining table is positioned to the morning tea position in plan A so that people can have more space to sit and have larger meetings. However, the table is reduced in size compared to in the first plan but it is surrounded by 2 more chairs, which are divided equally on each side of the table. The final notice is the entrance of the conference room which remains unchanged at the top right corner of the area.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (4 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ded 3 additional chairs for each table. the remaining table is positioned to the mo...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49099099099 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67229516179 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536036036036 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3590962654 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.777777778 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285714387092 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114412263296 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105414989169 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169760418037 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543516203121 0.0819641961636 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ded 3 additional chairs for each table. the remaining table is positioned to the mo...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49099099099 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67229516179 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536036036036 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3590962654 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.777777778 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285714387092 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114412263296 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105414989169 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169760418037 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543516203121 0.0819641961636 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.