number of arrests per year using illegal drugs
The line graph reveals the annual figures of arrests for consuming unlawful drugs in some places over a period of 15 years.
It is clear that imprisoned people for using illegal drugs increased sharply between 1999 and 2000. By contrast, it is interesting to note that the number of incarcerated people for illegal drug usage plummeted over the same period shown.
Looking at the line graph in more detail, illegal drug usage stood at about 55 people in 1991 and started to decline steadily till 20 over the next three years. However, this trend started to increase rapidly in 1993 and climbed two and a half times until 1996. This followed by a fluctuation over the next 3 years just before the sudden increase in 1999. From 1999 to 2000 the figures doubled and peaked at 80 arrests. Until the time when this figure started to remain firm, there was a significant decrease/plunged observed which roughly reached a low of 15 arrests in 2001 and over the next year remained stable. Starting 2002 there was a slight increase in 2003 at 20 arrests. Lately, illegal drug use was predicted to remain constant over the next years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... illegal drugs increased sharply between 1999 and 2000. By contrast, it is intere...
^^
Line 5, column 669, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2 there was a slight increase in 2003 at 20 arrests. Lately, illegal drug use was...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76020408163 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42927339366 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576530612245 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231835398996 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916030196673 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768924843369 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164267264402 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060081304592 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.