The international community should take action to ensure that all countries reduce the consumption of fossil fuels, such as gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The international community should take action to ensure that all countries reduce the consumption of fossil fuels, such as gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that the international community should put more effort to encourage countries to decrease fossil fuel consumption like petrol, gas, and coal. Personally, I completely agree with this point of view for a range of reasons.
It is no doubt true that the burning of fossil fuels is universally recognized as the largest source of emissions of greenhouse gases in the world and one of the key factors responsible for global warming. First and foremost, it could be argued that consuming oil and coal in domestic and industrial activities produce tons of carbon dioxide and other detrimental chemicals annually. Besides, in recent years overconsumption and overpopulation lead to an increase in transportation usage which contributes to a vast amount of fume and greenhouse gases in the world’s atmosphere. As a result of this, Earth's temperature is rising and associated with several adverse effects such as global warming, ice melting in the poles, sea level rising and other appalling weather conditions. Another important reason could be thought that fuel fossils are generally assumed as a non-renewable resource since they need millions of years to form. Thus if utilization of natural resources is not minimized and controlled, human beings will probably suffer from energy depletion unless scientists come up with a solution of an alternative energy source. As a consequence of this problem countries may encounter price escalation and there will be repercussions such as economic crisis or/and stagnation.
In conclusion, it is understandable that the international community should take measures in order to reduce the consumption of fossil fuels for several reasons mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
... chemicals annually. Besides, in recent years overconsumption and overpopulation lead...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 939, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ce they need millions of years to form. Thus if utilization of natural resources is ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, may, so, thus, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4406779661 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12496779644 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627118644068 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5030863235 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.75 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5833333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378599098782 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149852040074 0.084324248473 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.216773807899 0.0667982634062 325% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.369297924684 0.151304729494 244% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.370258599687 0.056905535591 651% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.