Percentage of female MPs
The line chart shows the proportions of women in the parliaments of five European nations during the 12-year period since 2000.
In general, most of these countries experienced the rise of female members in Parliaments, except for Belgium, where female Parliament members were seen as lower than in other countries by the end of the period.
In 2000, about 3% of the UK’s parliamentary members were women. The trend reached approximately 9% and 20% by 2004 and 2008, until it peaked at roughly 26% at the end of the period. In Germany and France, there were nearly 33% and 25% at the beginning of the period depicted, respectively. These two nations saw the rising trend for years before peaking at roughly 37% and 33%, correspondingly, by 2012.
In 2000, the proportion of female parliamentarians in Italy was recorded at roughly 27%, in contrast to Belgium, where the women in parliament made up about 17% of the total. Italian female members continued rising gradually until they accounted for almost 40% of total parliamentarians at the end of the period, while the percentage of Belgian women peaked at nearly 24% by 2008 before falling to roughly 23% in 2012.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... years before peaking at roughly 37% and 33%, correspondingly, by 2012. In 2000,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, except for, in contrast, in general, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94416243655 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89014867526 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543147208122 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5804596958 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.75 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.625 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100436251935 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399197058097 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536201513301 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0635199668319 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636725025553 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.