People born today can expect to live longer than people in previous generations What are some of the positive and negative implications of this phenomenon Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience

Essay topics:

People born today can expect to live longer than people in previous generations. What are some of the positive and negative implications of this phenomenon?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience

People's lifespans have been considerably prolonged, much more than they could have been in the past, thanks to the rapid development of modern healthcare. This medical miracle could not only be considered a blessing to us but also had a great impact on the worldwide economy and environment, which are detailed below. 
First of all, aging can be seen as a signal of good luck in many cultures and beliefs, which allows people to enjoy their lives as well as gather with family members. For example, in some Asian countries like China and Vietnam, the wish for longevity is used the most to bless the elderly. In addition, with a long age accompanied by good health, people will be able to fulfill their incomplete dreams and plans in their youth. For instance, since 2000, the number of the elderly traveling throughout their country or around the world has drastically increased, which could not have become very popular many decades ago. 
However, this preserved number of old people might affect the economy of a country since its government has to prepare an enormous budget for their insurance. As a result, taxes may rise as well, followed by an overburdened healthcare system. Moreover, material resources would be unable to provide sufficiently for the whole population, including the elderly. It could lead to massive pollution, not even new diseases and crimes resulting from the downfall of living standards. 
In conclusion, longevity could be a foundation of happiness for some people, but a curse for others. A way to save and optimize our living resources for the current population should be put on the priority list.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d environment, which are detailed below.  First of all, aging can be seen as a sig...
^^^
Line 2, column 621, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve become very popular many decades ago.  However, this preserved number of old pe...
^^^
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g from the downfall of living standards.  In conclusion, longevity could be a foun...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03676470588 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71700877404 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639705882353 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.8183166722 49.4020404114 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.222222222 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2222222222 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 17.2222222222 7.06120827912 244% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134162015164 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527029270526 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.022636477529 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079222260724 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015415578782 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d environment, which are detailed below.  First of all, aging can be seen as a sig...
^^^
Line 2, column 621, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve become very popular many decades ago.  However, this preserved number of old pe...
^^^
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g from the downfall of living standards.  In conclusion, longevity could be a foun...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03676470588 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71700877404 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639705882353 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.8183166722 49.4020404114 190% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.222222222 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2222222222 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 17.2222222222 7.06120827912 244% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134162015164 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527029270526 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.022636477529 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079222260724 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015415578782 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.