The pic charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries: China and India.
Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data.
A glance at the pie charts given reveals the China and India’s food consumption in terms of four categories in year 2008 when compared with the World’s. All in all, a striking similarity with slight difference can be noticed on the distribution of the proportion of the four categories in the mentioned countries.
Of the four categories, it is evident that the major energy source was the processed food, accounting for slightly over 40% for people over the world. Likewise, a similar percentage of processed food consumption by Chinese and Indian was recorded during the same period. In stark contrast, however, constituting a negligible 4%, nuts and seeds was considered as the least significant food in the world. This type of food, although was also not prevalent in China and India, was with twofold and threefold higher proportion of consumption in China and India respectively than in the world.
As for the intake of remaining two categories - Vegetable and Fruits and Animal Food, China and India witnessed opposition trend. While more Chinese (32%) took Vegetable and Fruits as their diet than Indian (23%), people in India than in China consumed 12% more Animal Food. Additionally, the consumption rate of both types was in the vicinity of the world’s.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, so, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1073.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15865384615 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93965310944 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.3527823162 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.222222222 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249031761692 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105034702661 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065696868068 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168172704461 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0109868420389 0.0819641961636 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.