The picture below shows the changes of a park from 1980 to now. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrate how a park transformed between 1980 and at present.
A cursory glance at the diagrams is enough to make it clear that in 1980, the road divided this park into two main parts. However, this park is separated into four different areas now.
According to the diagrams, to the west of this area, the pond and bench still exist without any change in location or size now. Meanwhile, the area for flowers located at the left-hand corner of this park in 1980 made way for the space for bush.
As the maps suggest, the area of flowers situated in the southeast of this park has been replaced by the playground. In the meantime, to the northeast of this park, trees have been cut down. Moreover, picnic and barbecue area have been built up in this place. Furthermore, more chairs and desks have been added in the former site of trees. Another thing to add is that there still have a small number of trees in this place.
Overall, this park witnessed a dramatic change over a 20-year period starting from 1980.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 387, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...r thing to add is that there still have a small number of trees in this place. Overall, this pa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, while, another thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59239130435 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29112670502 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.9440570097 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.8181818182 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7272727273 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 5.23603664747 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139717486376 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596747645267 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498694236601 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0979207202021 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476069742162 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.