Many countries thought that children have to do homework in their free time while others say children should do more outdoor activity. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today’s world, there is a public debate about the free time of children. Many people share the view that children have to do homework in their free time. Meanwhile, others are of the view that they should have time to do more outdoor activities. Both of the views have their own merits. However, I am totally convinced that children should spend free time doing more outdoor activity rather than doing their homework.
To begin with, the most frequent factor contributing to this opinion is that spending too much time on homework might unbalance the life of children. One example to support this view is that in 2013, research conducted at Stanford University found that students in high-achieving communities who spend too much time on homework experience more stress, physical health problems, a lack of balance in their lives, and alienation from society. Therefore, it is undisputed that children should not spend their free time on their homework.
In addition, one explanation to support this view is that in this day and age, children allocate a large amount of their awake time for their study at school. This is shown by the following example. According to the statistics about hours at school of children worldwide, in Chile, an average student spends approximately 8 hours studying at school. For that reason, it is clear that they need time to relieve stress by outdoor activity instead of doing homework in their spare time.
Take everything into consideration, we may draw the conclusion that doing homework in free time can bring negative aspects to children. Moreover, children are pushed under the pressure of time studying at school nowadays. As a result, I utterly agree with the view that children should spend their free time joining in outdoor activity instead of doing homework.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, in addition, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07023411371 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6136990009 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508361204013 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9787155581 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.066666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453017757028 0.244688304435 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197264315983 0.084324248473 234% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146391616985 0.0667982634062 219% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.319174127065 0.151304729494 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152989320021 0.056905535591 269% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.