Some people think that secondary or high school students should be taught money management because it is an important life skill. Do you agree or disagree with the statement?
In today’s world, it is thought that students in secondary or high school should be taught money management skills, which is relatively essential. From my point of view, I remain unconvinced with this view.
To begin with, the most frequent factor contributing to my opinion is that in this day and age, students have to acquire a large amount of knowledge from different subjects during the time they study at school. Therefore, there is no sufficient time for them to study money management skills. One example to support this view is that in Vietnam, both students in secondary and high school have to study thirteen subjects during seven hours at school such as: Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry and so on. For this reason, it is obvious that students will not have any time to learn this skill.
In addition, one explanation to support my view is that studying this skill is a waste of time because children have no practical use for this skill. In fact, in Vietnam, parents just give their children a small amount of money to meet their immediate demand such as breakfast or nosh. Consequently, there is no need for children to study this skill when they are in secondary or high school.
Given the aforementioned points, it may be concluded that it is unnecessary for secondary or high school students to study this skill. As a consequence of this, I am of the view that students in secondary and high school do not need to study money management skills.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, may, second, so, therefore, in addition, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1217.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81027667984 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6663646087 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 176.041082164 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486166007905 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.9 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6868608705 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.636363636 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244074408058 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120102025992 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887451977557 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192334741386 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733323684282 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 78.4519038076 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.