The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The flow-chart illustrates how used glass bottles are recycled to be usable products.
Overall, it is clear to see that the process has three different stages, beginning with collection of wasted bottles. The next step shows how to recycle glass bottles and the process ends with the filled bottles ready for sales again.
In the first stage, it starts with gathering used bottles at collection points before getting them transported. Then, all the bottles have to be put under high-pressure water to clear all the dust. Next, they are classified into three particular types: brown, green and clear before being delivered to the glass factories. In this place, all the glass bottles are shattered into small pieces. Those species are burnt under 600°C to 800°C into recycled liquid glass in the furnace. Then, after mixing some new recycled liquid glass, the mixture is formed by a mould into the completed glass bottles. Finally, they are used again as the container of liquid and delivered to the sales locations, such as supermarkets.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12865497076 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48405193269 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590643274854 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.9153565412 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.7 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140936475512 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060296727267 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503348012067 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10984359165 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412674786541 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.