The pie chart below show how the city of Hertofordshire funded its public libraries over two financial terms.
Given pie chart represents how city of Hertfordshire supported its libraries during 2014-15 and 2016-17.
Libraries was getting funding from four main sources. The main income came from council tax, that is more that 50 percent of total income. Libraries financing did not experienced drastic changes during these 2014/15 and 2016/17 periods. Similarly, total income for supporting libraries almost remained the same.
Major differences between two periods funding is that council tax increased their support by 11 percent from 57 percent in the first period and to 68 percent in the second period. Also, there was slight increase in second period from other government grants, it went from 17 percent to 19 percent. A big decrease was revenue support grant which lower their funding by 12 percent, from 18 % in the first period to 6 % in the second period. Business rates and other incomes remained pretty much the same during both periods. In the end, total income libraries received - decreased by 3,1 million.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'experience'
Suggestion: experience
...tal income. Libraries financing did not experienced drastic changes during these 2014/15 an...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23926380368 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50356111589 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650306748466 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.249964539 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119141565484 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566913186556 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716190647902 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123800845565 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919308951255 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.