In the modern world, the image (photograph or film) is becoming a more powerful way of communicating than the written word.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In our contemporary world we spend many hours on social media and other websites which are feeding us with thousands of images per day. While our attention is occupied by internet and its images, text becomes less powerful then before. This essay will discuss both visual and written information in more depth.
On the one hand, communication through images, movies and other visuals became effectively introduced through internet. People watching movies or video clips gets huge amount of information, but not necessarily have time to absorb and process it. Moreover, while our attention is occupied by huge amount of images per day, on each we spend just a split second without having our attention concentrated to one thing. For example, Facebook gives just a glimpse of other people lives while leaving it to your own interpretation.
In contrast, reading text gives us deeper understanding in one topic and gives us better knowledge about world. For example, reading book in which has been done deep research gives more information than movie could never supplement it. Visual communication can transfer information quicker than text, but it can not give more facts and details. Both these ways of communicating information can support each other.
In conclusion, books could never be replaced as a communication tool with visual information. Written text gives us more time to reflect and process information. Moreover, written text gives us deeper understanding about the world, while images does it in shallow way. Despite the fact, people are choosing easy way to get information without putting too much effort where outcome is adequate to it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
... its images, text becomes less powerful then before. This essay will discuss both vi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, second, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25283018868 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79417081268 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588679245283 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1061082678 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.8 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166433764222 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608662115406 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394120238266 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103604899996 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301183802601 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.