The chart below compare Australian government investments in various energy sectors and the share of electricity generated by those energies.
The chart shows Australian government investments is different energy sectors in comparison how much each sector generated electricity.
Australian government invested into 5 different energy sectors. The biggest disproportion appears in wind sector which gets the most investments - 42 percent, but it is second lowest in electricity generation - only 2 percent. Also other huge disproportion is in coal sector which produces the most electricity in Australia, but it is one of the poorest supported with only 10 percent investments. In the first chart is mentioned that 13 percent investments gets “other” sector which does not generate any electricity.
In comparison these two charts, the nuclear sector is the most equal within 21 percent investments which produces 22 % electricity. Solar sector is supported 8 times more that it gives energy. The most poorly supported sector is natural gas, but it is second biggest energy producer with 27 percent.
Overall, all sectors are supported by government disproportionately to the energy it produces, despite nuclear sector where investments goes into equation with electricity generated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...much each sector generated electricity. Australian government invested into 5 di...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...lectricity generation - only 2 percent. Also other huge disproportion is in coal sec...
^^^^
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...es not generate any electricity. In comparison these two charts, the nuclear sector is...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76608187135 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30780953362 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561403508772 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1126125852 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.555555556 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306990972881 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155245175474 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984594272579 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230243216703 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894488363759 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.4140731707 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.