The maps below show a coal mine and its redevelopment into a visitor attraction site. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The map illustrates site transition from a coal mine into turist attraction site.
Firstly, coal mine has seven functions which is spread out in the site. Two of them stays in the same place as the same function in the planed visitor attraction proposal. At the same place remains tourist site entrance and car park with the small transition from lorry parking to normal car parking.
Secondly, there is introduced new location with children playground function which have not existed before. In addition, new function - museum is planed instead two previous functions in coal mine site- lunch room and staff change rooms. Also there is planed new walking track through the site in the visitor attraction proposal. Lastly, same other functions in coal mine site, like two of the waste locations and medical center is tansformed into totally new functions like cafe, driving circuit and pond. In the new visitor attraction site - museum is dominating building which suppose to be the main attraction for turists.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ite- lunch room and staff change rooms. Also there is planed new walking track throu...
^^^^
Line 5, column 581, Rule ID: SUPPOSE_TO[1]
Message: Probably you should use a past participle here: 'supposed'.
Suggestion: supposed
...e - museum is dominating building which suppose to be the main attraction for turists. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, lastly, second, secondly, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15757575758 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47577093354 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569696969697 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7425164361 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5555555556 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205945239589 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106288347293 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791162205638 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1807820415 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0775266812274 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.