These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away, whereas in the past people used to repair damaged items and keep them for a long time.
Explain why you think this change has happened.
What are the effects of this change in attitude?
In this contemporary world people tend to consume and throw things away more than ever before. Nowadays people are more wasteful, instead repairing broken items, like it was done some generations ago, they just get rid of it and buy new. This essay will discuss why this change has appeared and what are the possible outcomes of it.
People are consuming more than ever before. Fashion is one of the biggest industries with products ending up in landfills. Clothes became much more affordable, that is why people can buy new clothes more often and throw it without thinking. For example, one of biggest clothing stores - H&H introduced that fashion can change 52 times a year and people could wear different clothes every week. Secondly, products became less durable than before. Companies has interests to sell short lasting items like electrical kitchen equipment with the purpose to sell more in the near future. Sadly, these ideas are based on consumerism model which is hugely unsustainable.
The idea of buying new instead of repairing old leads to environmental pollution. Firstly, it fills our planet with landfills with items which does not decomposes in hundreds of years. For example, plastic is used in most of the products, which later will stay in landfills for 1000 years. Another reason that industries which produces products uses more oil and gas than before to distribute items. This leads to bigger amount of carbon dioxide into our atmosphere. Also, it is believed, that all of this is causing climate change.
In conclusion, nowadays we are used to buy new product instead of repairing. In this society people are choosing easy “popular” way to consume without putting some time and effort to repair with the reason to save the planet from garbage and greenhouse gas emissions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ontemporary world people tend to consume and throw things away more than ever bef...
^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the biggest'.
Suggestion: of the biggest
...w it without thinking. For example, one of biggest clothing stores - H&H introduced that f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'decompose'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: decompose
...ith landfills with items which does not decomposes in hundreds of years. For example, plas...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...leads to bigger amount of carbon dioxide into our atmosphere. Also, it is believe...
^^
Line 7, column 32, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to buying'.
Suggestion: used to buying
...ange. In conclusion, nowadays we are used to buy new product instead of repairing. In th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10067114094 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.630179097 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580536912752 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9506258183 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4444444444 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5555555556 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38888888889 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 3.4128256513 410% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189043906969 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565491354423 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531927258379 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121003988994 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540921437268 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.