Some people believe that eventually all jobs will be done by artificially intelligent robots. What is your opinion?
Some people think, AI robots will replace all jobs in the future. Although many would argue that AI technology could perform better, I think robots will never substitute emotional intelligence human beings has, therefore the jobs that requires this quality will stay. This essay will discuss why not all the jobs can be taken over by robots.
It is argued that most human jobs can be automated by robots especially jobs that involves lots of data. Instead of having millions of people with this knowledge performing work, this information can be gathered and conducted from one single AI robot. For example AI technology could be as an alternative to the doctors, detectors could find out about human physical condition before he feels any negative symptoms. In addition, artificial intelligence could execute more precisely finding diseases. For these reasons, jobs that can be performed much more effective by artificial intelligence will be substituted.
On the other hand, some jobs can not be replaced by AI robots because it will hardly be able to conduct such a tasks. Some jobs require emotional support and complex physical execution. For example, nurses would be much harder to exchange than doctors. Nurses job include empathy, multitasking, performing tasks like helping for a patient to shower himself is not achievable to artificial intelligence technologies. AI can not imitate and replace human with their emotional intelligence.
To sum up, artificial intelligence will take over jobs many of human jobs. AI robots will eventually do the jobs which require to hold unlimited amount of data. However, labor which need specific variety of physical skills will stay to conduct for humans. I believe, just a few jobs will be safe in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...replace all jobs in the future. Although many would argue that AI technology coul...
^^
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a task' or simply 'tasks'?
Suggestion: a task; tasks
... it will hardly be able to conduct such a tasks. Some jobs require emotional support an...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 128, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'holding'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: holding
...ll eventually do the jobs which require to hold unlimited amount of data. However, labo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, therefore, for example, i think, in addition, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 7.85571142285 293% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23591549296 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73979640275 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56338028169 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3731437556 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4705882353 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7058823529 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322445480129 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124045869722 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753418447601 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224623458887 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441362589591 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.