International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment.
Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?
Many countries gained a lot from international tourism. Some people are concerned about effect of international tourism to local people and the environment. This essay will discuss what is negative side of international tourism including pollution and good aspects including economical grow.
Most of the people prefer to spend their holidays traveling abroad instead of staying in their own country. Traveling long distances to reach holiday destination causes bigger carbon dioxide emission into atmosphere. For example, taking four hours flight from Norway to Spain causing much more carbon dioxide released into air than if people would be satisfied to spend their holidays in local resort. Moreover, people living in touristic areas are not satisfied about huge amounts of tourist occupying their city. For instance, Venice is one example where tourists took over the city, where is hard to find local person.
On the other hand, touristic places makes a lot of money, especially businesses related with recreation and tourism. This improves local economy and created new jobs. For example, after book release “Eat, pray, love” Bali became one of the main tourist destination. In Bali tourism infrastructure boomed, there were built lot of new hotels, restaurants, also has been created yoga retreat centres. Overall, this brings positive impact on local economy.
In conclusion, tourism improves countries economic situation, but at the same time it disturbs local people lives. I think, people should explore more their own country their own culture, nature before going to other countries. As a consequence, this would lower carbon gas emission and people would create a deeper relationship with own country.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54339622642 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65943781081 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645283018868 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0770556629 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8125 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5625 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181056738403 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696750360809 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880172794782 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12552706894 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108598772229 0.056905535591 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.