The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
The given pie chart provided information about different kinds of damages on agricultural land and the table demonstrated total amount of land degradation in North America, Europe, and Oceania during 1990s.
Overall, it can be observed that over-grazing occupied the main reason for damaging agricultural land, by 35% in the world. During 1990s, three different areas showed various degree of damage by deforestation, over-cultivation, and over-grazing, yielding the most severe one, Europe, which is 23% in total.
It is clear that over-grazing is contributed to the highest rations in Oceania, which is 11.3%, exceeding 1.7% in deforestation and 0% in over-cultivation. However, deforestation was the top reason caused degradation in Europe showed 9.8%. Moreover, North America’s farming was over loaded, 3.3% out of 5% in total land degradation.
During 1990s, the second and third reason jeopardized the available land were deforestation and over-cultivation, which were 30% and 28%, respectively. Finally, there was 7% of other damages in the worldwide.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1990s'.
Suggestion: during the 1990s
...n in North America, Europe, and Oceania during 1990s. Overall, it can be observed that o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'During the 1990s'.
Suggestion: During the 1990s
...agricultural land, by 35% in the world. During 1990s, three different areas showed various d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 2, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'During the 1990s'.
Suggestion: During the 1990s
...t of 5% in total land degradation. During 1990s, the second and third reason jeopardize...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77358490566 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.5029131728 2.65546596893 132% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635220125786 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.890336969 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.75 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227143100787 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961185015871 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721102817563 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141138545268 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523229188319 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.4140731707 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.