The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarize the in formation by selecting and reporting the main features, and ma

The given pie chart displays the factors behind degradation of land and it is clear that over-grazing of cattle is the main reason for this problem. From the table we can see that this factor had a huge impact on Oceania as more than 10% of its land got degraded by over-grazing. Europe is not far behind Oceania as 5.5% of its land has been affected by this followed by North America whose 1.5% land is degraded by over-grazing.

Deforestation also plays a vital role in degrading land and it is evident from the table that almost 10% of Europe's land has been degraded by it. In North America and Oceania, deforestation has not affected much of the land with just 0.2% and 1.7% of the land respectively getting reduced in quality.

Over-cultivation is another catalyst for this issue. The problem of over-cultivation does not exist for Oceania but definitely affects Europe and North America as 7.7% and 3.3% of land got degraded respectively due to excessive cultivation.

It can be inferred from the table that in Europe almost a quarter of the total land has been degraded by the aforementioned three factors as well as some other factors. Oceania can still cope up with this issue as it has still more than 85% of the land that is not degraded. North America is in a better condition than rest of the two as only 5% of its land has degraded. It seems some of the environmental policies are working really well for North America.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 382, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...y 5% of its land has degraded. It seems some of the environmental policies are working real...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'really', 'so', 'still', 'well', 'as well as']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.259927797834 0.268076937826 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.169675090253 0.116061578633 146% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0505415162455 0.0759168565197 67% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0758122743682 0.0366838410393 207% => Less adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0361010830325 0.0131127313244 275% => OK
Prepositions: 0.176895306859 0.155750635184 114% => OK
Participles: 0.0685920577617 0.0379272487307 181% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.78551203156 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00361010830325 0.0210936926555 17% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00361010830325 0.00175180941692 206% => OK
Determiners: 0.0938628158845 0.0948980150116 99% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0108303249097 0.00437022459523 248% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0072202166065 0.00967000014798 75% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1439.0 1161.00487805 124% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.9 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6431372549 5.90752243213 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73763899035 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.270588235294 0.337110787985 80% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.21568627451 0.247514529752 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.141176470588 0.171178102325 82% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0745098039216 0.112407865282 66% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78551203156 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474509803922 0.546246751206 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 43.9017842011 49.3433353143 89% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 8.93414634146 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.1818181818 23.0094962315 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1038164289 42.9750493124 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.818181818 135.714022679 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 23.0094962315 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.636363636364 0.689975730869 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 44.7504456328 47.7609492067 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.79487179487 2.94281807926 61% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34285167648 0.418131533498 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.18648597694 0.181151798455 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0821551616896 0.0850326197045 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.670691810578 0.706616315825 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.119794041708 0.157042692854 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182353303871 0.228904883108 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106739406514 0.108899403657 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.309765570065 0.367819155151 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0737409408112 0.0812612215331 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253199381554 0.316326947829 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0716163589289 0.0921553760075 78% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70731707317 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.14146341463 438% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.08536585366 24% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.16585365854 158% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 0.956097560976 523% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.02926829268 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 10.0 7.1512195122 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.