The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summary the information
The pie chart illustrates the proportion of land degradation in agriculture which is cause by four negative factors, while the table data demonstrates specifically about three main regions which degraded in the 1990s.
Overall, it is clear to seen that the highest percentages of reasons which caused land degradation was over grazing. Besides, Europe area was negatively effect to productivity of agriculture lands more than North America and Oceania.
In particular, over-grazing was the highest percentage lead to land degradation, occupied for 35%. Another big reason of less productivity is deforestation which held 30% of the total. Besides that, over cultivivation also effects the productions of land at 28%, which quadrupled the figure for other reason of retrogression are remaining 7%.
As for the details from the table, the most strinking is European area which occurred over one fifth percent with the highlighted cause is deforstration at 9.8%. The second area of land degradation is Oceania with the main reason of over grazing at 11,3%. In addition, it is surprise the propotion of over-cultivation in Oceania is 0%. North America has the least negative effecting of farmland with only 5% in the 1990s, and the major explanation which is over- cultivation, taking up the percentage of 3.3%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, second, so, while, as for, in addition, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34299516908 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12062337925 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594202898551 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0308029207 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.6 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174788879119 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743707253286 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606210959139 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126327505569 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608605012863 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.