The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990.
The given circular pie chart, decribed that, there were three regions in the world during 1990. which were caused by three major reasons of land degradation. The data is calibrated in per centum. It is clear and coherent representation.
Firstly, we can seen that, in the diagram, there are four main causes, which are affected on agricultural land. These are: over-cultivation(28%), over- grazing(35%), deforestation(30%) and other (7%), these causes are main behind the land degradation in the world.
Furthermore, in the land degradation including three major regions: North America, Europe and Oceania, while as three main causes over-cultivation, over-grazing. North America degraded the land by over-cultivation(3.3%), Europe in deforestation(9.8%) and Oceania in over-grazing(11.3%).
As a result, Europe at first position in the land degradation, which were total land degradation (23%) than the other two regions in the world during 1990.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...three regions in the world during 1990. which were caused by three major reasons of l...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...three regions in the world during 1990. which were caused by three major reasons of l...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 17, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'see' or 'be seen'?
Suggestion: see; be seen
...rent representation. Firstly, we can seen that, in the diagram, there are four ma...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, so, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 140.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73571428571 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43979062825 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.77815282585 2.65546596893 142% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.698440882 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2222222222 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5555555556 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275560993616 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113781448194 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832605374002 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173929649561 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607100082672 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 61.2550243902 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 11.4140731707 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.