The given essay contains a table and a pie chart. The tables shows information about main causes of agricultural land becoming less productive in three main regions which are North America, Europe and Oceania in 1990. The pie chart illustrates main reasons of degradation of agricultural land worldwide in 1990.
In North America, 5% of land was degraded, among which 0.2% was degraded by deforestation, 3.3% by over cultivation and 1.5% by over grazing. Whereas in Europe,9.8% of land was degraded by deforestation, 7.7% by over cultivation and 5.5% by over grazing which accounted for 23% of total land. On the other hand, in Oceania regions, 1.7% of land was degraded by cutting down of trees, 11.3% by excessive grazing but no land was degraded by over cultivation.
Taking into account causes of worldwide land degradation in 1990, most of the land was degraded by excessive grazing which accounts for 35% of total land degradation. 30% of land was degraded by over cultivation, 28% of land was degraded by deforestation and 7% land was degraded by other various causes.
To sum up, most of the land were degraded by over grazing worldwide and in Oceania areas. Whereas in Europe, main reason of land degradation was deforestation and in North America was over cultivation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'show'.
Suggestion: show
...ins a table and a pie chart. The tables shows information about main causes of agricu...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...th America, Europe and Oceania in 1990. The pie chart illustrates main reasons of d...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f agricultural land worldwide in 1990. In North America, 5% of land was degrade...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, whereas, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06572769953 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93911712707 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446009389671 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6568718828 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.9 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172304172912 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109823395848 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112116805163 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155817871493 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159681790287 0.0819641961636 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.