The given line graphs demonstrate the number of people travelling through railways and percentage of train running on time between 2000 to 2009 respectively.
About 35 million, passenger travelled by train in 2000 which gradually increased to around 45 million in 2002. Number of people using railways rose upto 48 million in 2005 which was the highest figures compared to all years. There was constant fluctuation in number of passengers which again reached to same figure as in 2002 in 2009.
In 2002, 92 % train were punctual and percentage of train running on time rose by 4% and reached 96% in 2004. There was sudden drop in punctuality of train which declined to 92% in 2006. For two years, (2008 and 2009) train did not state or arrive late by approximately 97%. Train was least punctual in 2002 and 2006 in comparison to all given years.
To sum up, both the number of passengers using railways and percentage of train punctuality was in fluctuating trend between 2000 to 2009.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the least'.
Suggestion: was the least
...arrive late by approximately 97%. Train was least punctual in 2002 and 2006 in comparison...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84615384615 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63913192187 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544378698225 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.7638851453 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.0 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.44444444444 5.23603664747 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329897179363 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151676359215 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105205630934 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241758276226 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892925552791 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.