The first graph below shoes the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009. The second graph shows the percentage of train running on time from 2000 to 2009.
The first line graph gives the information about the number of train passengers in million from 2000 to 2009. At the beginning, there was a moderate increase before dramatically falling back to 35.5 in 2003, and then peaked at 48 in 2005. After that, the passengers number started to decrease smoothly with around 2.5 per year until in 2008, with 40, while an upward trend can be seen with 45 in the end.
The second line chart illustrated the proportion of punctuality of the train during the same period. The first five years witnessed a mild rise, increasing from 92% to 96%. However, there was a staggering drop in the next to years, decreasing directly back to 92%, which was same as that in 2000. Afterwards, the percentage of train running on time soared overwhelmingly, which peaked at more than 97% in 2008 and stabilized at 97% in 2009.
Overall, the numbers of passengers fluctuated between 35 and 48 over these years compared with the punctuality went up in total, except the three years, ranging from 2005 to 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...about the number of train passengers in million from 2000 to 2009. At the beginning, th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77653631285 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62894129935 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631284916201 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8052968284 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.875 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298983631374 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128511687115 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149969386955 0.0843802449381 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177954774264 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665440318153 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.