A glance at the pie chart provided reveals the reasons of degradation of agricultural land throughout the world and the table indicates the levels of degradation in North America, Europe, and Oceania in the 1990s.
Overall, over-grazing has the most detrimental impact on the land degradation. The three mentioned reasons shown in the pie chart caused the most serious damage in the agriculture industry in Europe.
Having a closer look on the pie chart, reasons of land degradation can be concluded to four proportion, namely over-grazing, deforestation, over-cultivation, and other minor factors. Over-grazing accounts for 35% damages on Earth, followed by 30% of deforestation. Third in terms of the negative impact on Earth is over-cultivation, occupied by around 28%.
In Europe, there was 9.8% of land degraded by deforestation in the researching years. Surprisingly, the main element causing worldwide land degradation (over-grazing), had caused just over 5% of land in Europe damage. Not to mention 23% of land there has been damaged. The situation of land damage was better in Oceania, with only approximately 13% of land was damaged in total. The factors causing land degradation, however, happened rather rare in North America, which accounted for only 5% in average.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly approximately 13% of land was damaged in total. The factors causing land degra...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30046966355 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.3921389779 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9090909091 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18181818182 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 1.13902439024 966% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172956684984 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675829093009 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592194353229 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119078262077 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458493415015 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.