The pie chart below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in UK in 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The give pie chart illustrates, the account for people in UK who were living in poverty in the year 2002.
Overall, sole parents was the majority of proportion who suffer poverty in household with 26%. However, single people suffer more than couple in poverty.
In particular, as far as children concern, couple with children was highest amount of poverty in compared to couple without children that is 15% and 9 % respectively. In addition, single no children categorized about 24% in poverty household type over the period given.
On the other hand, all households makes up 14% poverty rate in the year 2002. Moreover, in terms of aged people, single person represents slightly higher percentage which is 7 % ,while, aged couple comprises of only 5 %.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 2002. Overall, sole parents was the majority of proportion who suffer povert...
^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
... children concern, couple with children was highest amount of poverty in compared to couple...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...all households makes up 14% poverty rate in the year 2002. Moreover, in terms of ...
^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... slightly higher percentage which is 7 % ,while, aged couple comprises of only 5 %...
^^
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...entage which is 7 % ,while, aged couple comprises of only 5 %.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, so, while, in addition, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 636.0 965.302439024 66% => OK
No of words: 124.0 196.424390244 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12903225806 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.33699396548 3.73543355544 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69447852477 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.677419354839 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 189.9 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0581735223 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8571428571 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 5.23603664747 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128323970508 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625276097207 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699171938151 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886363818183 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706608507339 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.