The given circular charts highlight the information about the production of electricity by two different countries- Germany and France from three different sources during the year 2009. The data is calibrated in per centum which is clearly and coherently representated.
It can be seen that Germany produced 560 billion kWh of electricity in 2009, out of which 59% was generated by conventional thermal and 23% by nuclear power. Moreover, 17.4% of the total electricity had been produced with the help of renewables. Apart from all this, the electricity produced by renewables contained Biomass- 39.3%, Wind- 36.9%, Solar energy- 6.1%, and Hydroelectric power- 17.7% respectively.
As far as trend was concerned, France generated less electricity than Germany about 510 billion kWh in maximum proportion (76%) was generated by nuclear energy. In addition to this, conventional thermal had been produced 10.3% of the total whereas renewables produced 13.7% electricity. Furthermore, the ratio of renewable sources: biomass, wind, and Hydroelectric was 8.1:10.5:80.5 percent respectively.
Overall it is evident that Germany produced more amount of electricity than France. Also, Germany used more thermal whereas more nuclear power was been consumed by France to produce electricity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: WAS_BEEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'was' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: was; has been
...more thermal whereas more nuclear power was been consumed by France to produce electrici...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, whereas, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1099.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75392670157 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08413850361 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581151832461 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1931811577 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.9 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190089070481 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755607991623 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636476157551 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123270160894 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451749138907 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 11.4140731707 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.