The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.

The given linear graph reveals the information about the differences in wheat exports among three different areas: Australia,Canada and European community during the years 1985 to 1990.The data is calibrated in millions of tonnes.

It can be seen that in 1985, the value of wheat exports remained between 15 to 20; the values were 15 million tonnes (Australia),17 million tonnes (European community) and 19 million tonnes (Canada). Furthermore, in 1986, the value of export over Australia was increased whereas the export over Canada and European community was decreased. Moreover, in 1987,the export of wheat to Canada was greatly increased and the exporting value was reached at 21 million of tonnes.The exporting values of wheat over Australia and European countries were 14 and 15 million of tonnes during 1985.

As far as trend is concerned, exporting value of wheat to Canada was reached at a peak level in
1988 whereas the value of exporting wheat to Australia remained same as it was during the previous year.From 1988 to 1990,a regular decline was shown in the exporting value of Australia but exporting value of wheat to European countries was increased by these years.Consequently, the exporting values of wheat to Canada during 1989 were 14 and 19 million of tonnes respectively.

Overall,it is evident that in 1985,the exporting values was lying between 15 to 20 million tonnes whereas in the end (1990),the values remained between 10 to 21 million tonnes .

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Canada
...s among three different areas: Australia,Canada and European community during the years...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...community during the years 1985 to 1990.The data is calibrated in millions of tonne...
^^^
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...lue was reached at 21 million of tonnes.The exporting values of wheat over Australi...
^^^
Line 6, column 105, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: From
...same as it was during the previous year.From 1988 to 1990,a regular decline was show...
^^^^
Line 6, column 267, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Consequently
... countries was increased by these years.Consequently, the exporting values of wheat to Canad...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...llion of tonnes respectively. Overall,it is evident that in 1985,the exporting v...
^^^
Line 8, column 174, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...remained between 10 to 21 million tonnes .
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21518987342 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88701634168 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.417721518987 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 355.5 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 109.492389385 43.030603864 254% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 206.0 112.824112599 183% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.5 22.9334400587 172% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144291563943 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101932824898 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742064626606 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105899795958 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770452188271 0.0819641961636 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.9 13.2329268293 173% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.35 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.3012195122 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.