"Movies inspire us, challenge our assumptions, change our views, sometimes breaks our heart too, left our soul, and yes, teach us life lessons." Nevertheless, there are some issues which remains irrevocable and as complex as ever. one such issue here is of movie making. For instance, the given topic asserts that on which subject movies should be based; social stigmas or real life heroes? Through this essay, I shall explore the dimensions of this topic and shape up my opinion by the end.
On one side, there is a group of people who believe that movies should be based on social stigmas. They strengthen their view point by claiming that discrimination among people on social evils is increasing day by day. So, movies are the best way to mend these social evils. These stigmas may be regarding religions, racism, gender inequality, and so on. The best epitome of this could be the "PK" movie; based on religious discrimination. In this movie, the leading actor: Amir khan reveals the myths of people regarding the God. The main motive of this movie is to show that 'God is one'.
Contrary to this, there is an opposing group of people who believe that the life history of a real hero should be shown in the movies. To make their argument convincing, they claim that these kind of movies will increase the motivational level of a person. The person will take spark to be like those real heroes. Not only this, the person will also learn to do struggle in life to become renowned one. The movie "Bhaag Milkha Bhaag" would be the perfect illustration of this. This movie shows the life history of Milkha Singh, who won the merathone race, after his inevitable hardworking.
Nevertheless, weighing both the options, I believe that there is no single conclusion. Still, I take this ground that an effective clap requires both use of hands. So, both types of movies are essential in our society. Social stigmas based movies will help to overcome the social evils from the society whereas real life heroes' movies will encourage the morale of the people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...ins irrevocable and as complex as ever. one such issue here is of movie making. For...
^^^
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ir argument convincing, they claim that these kind of movies will increase the motivationa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, then, whereas, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9011299435 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60635895944 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559322033898 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8395731181 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.619047619 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8571428571 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355842325138 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104007602643 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102877506504 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215703003016 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392083489341 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.