The given pictorial representations compare the information about a small island (100 metres) which had been constructed for tourists including facilities like accomodation, restaurants, a reception, a beach for swimming, and a pier. It is clear and coherent representation.
It is crystal clear that before the renovation, there were only trees and a beach present on the island which was 100 metres in size and surrounded by a sea. After the development, many facilities for tourists were made. Not only footpaths were made to lead the tourists to accomodation and beach area but vehicle tracks were also made for an easy access to the reception and the restaurant. Generally speaking, most of the development was shown in the West area near the beach.
Locating the second map, It was clearly shown that the accommodation was occured at the East and West to the reception. Nextly, restaurant was present at the North corner of the reception whereas the pier was located in the South region. Moreover, trees were present on the same site as they were shown in the first map.
Overall, It is evident that the whole island had been turned into a tourist spot without affecting the natural resources such as trees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'easy access'.
Suggestion: easy access
...a but vehicle tracks were also made for an easy access to the reception and the restaurant. Ge...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, moreover, second, so, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01477832512 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86872123141 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6552886489 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.8 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0998349505259 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389890419749 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313286023282 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0609266991277 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212412158895 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.