The given circular charts highlights the information about the ages of the people divided in three different categories of two different countries- Yemen and Italy by the year 2000 having projections for the year 2050. The data is calibrated in per centum which is clearly and coherently representated.
It can be seen that in Yemen, during 2000, the natives of age between 0-14 years covered half of the total value (50.1%) whereas the adults who was above 60 years covered only 3.6% of the total. Apart from all this, it had been seen that the value of natives lying between 15 to 59 years age group was 46.3%. Furthermore, it was expected that in 2050, the value of these three groups will be 37%, 57.3%, and 5.7% respectively.
As far as trend was concerned, in Italy, the value of 0-14 years old people was 14.3% in 2000 which will be decreased by 2050 and will remained 11.5% of the total value. Moreover, 15-59 years age group covered more than half of the total value- 61.6% and the value of over 60 years had been 24.1% during 2000. In 2050, the expected values of 15-59 years old and over 60 years old was 46.2% and 42.3% respectively.
Overall, it is evident that the value of 15-59 years old age group will be the highest in both the countries: Yemen and Italy by 2050.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'remain'
Suggestion: remain
...hich will be decreased by 2050 and will remained 11.5% of the total value. Moreover, 15-...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, whereas, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55603448276 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32118772515 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491379310345 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5463447903 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.444444444 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122821175101 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624294281971 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06852043332 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104932739305 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630122045215 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 79.94 61.2550243902 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.