With steady growth in transportation, the lifestyles of people have been greatly affected. They have achieved various milestones; However, Some issues remain unchallenged and as complex as ever. One such issue here is of air travelling. This particular topic asserts that whether; air travelling should limited or go without a limit? Through this essay, I shall explore the dimensions of this topic and shape up my opinion by the end.
On one side, there is a group of people who believe that air travelling should go without a limit. They strengthen their view point by claiming that it (air travelling) saves the time. Journey taken by a plane will take less time as compared to train or a motor car. Air travelling helps us to reach our destinies in a short time. We can travel to different international countries with the help of air travelling. The another reason to support the view point is that it makes link with the other countries. One can easily export and import to the other countries. Therefore, the economy of a country will increase through air travelling.
Contrary to this, there is an opposing group of people who believe that air travelling must be limited. To make their argument convincing, they claim that air travelling cause pollution in the atmosphere. The planes emit carbon-dioxide in the air due to which it's level is increasing in the air; causes many breathing problems among people. The best epitome of this is Asthma (a disease in which a person cannot breathe properly). Moreover, a survey conducted by the government reveals that the amount of fuel used by the single flight of plane is that much by which a motor car can easily run though out the year.
Nevertheless, weighing the both sides, I believe that there is no single conclusion: still, I take this ground that an effective clap requires both use of hands. Government should allow air travelling to only those people who have an emergency; otherwise, the road vehicles should preferred for travelling. A person only refer air travelling when there is no another option to reach the desired place.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 357, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...only refer air travelling when there is no another option to reach the desired pla...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, then, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91267605634 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73516049909 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543661971831 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.788610378 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0476190476 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9047619048 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299698106623 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844941539076 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899629550942 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17591860586 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399822090684 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.