Some people think that air travel should grow without a limit, while others believe that governments should limit it. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays journeys in other countries have become omnipresent because of three main causes. The first reason is that the way of a trip arranging does not demand enormous efforts. The second reason is that the standard of living has boosted last two decades, people can afford visiting other countries. Thirdly, the majority of counties open to travellers, there is not any travel restrictions. Due to boosting air journeys, the controversial question related to it has permeated and has been considered, people's opinions are divided on the point. Some people claim that air travel should be reduced by the government, whilst there is another opposite point of view. From my perspective, I agree with the proposition that they should be restricted because of dramatic environmental repercussions.
On the one hand, it seems undeniable that environmental issues are harmful effects of human activity on the biophysical environment. People develop business, do not care about immense effects on surrounding environment, aiming to obtain as much profit as possible. Consequently, the global warming has been going on for the past fifty years due to human activity. For human to live sustainability, natural resources should be used at a rate at which they can be replenished. So people must reckon about emissions and natural resources which they consume. Governments make the attempt to reduce using vehicles, which use fuel, by electrical vehicle. Additionally, government encourage people to use the public transport, making it more comfortable. By implementing these ideas in reality, governments reduce oil extractions, which are necessary for the fuel production, and decrease the level of atmosphere's emissions, since if there are less cars on the roads, there are less harmful gases in the atmosphire . Nevertheless, authorities should also realise, how many fuels does a plain consume withing one flight? And how much carbon dioxide a plane emit during a flight? Probably, this amount of fuel would be enough for one year car consuming or perhaps, the same proposition is fair related to adverse gases. If governments reduced car usage, it would be fair to suggest that governments should limit the number of flights in the purposes of conserving natural resources and saving environment. As a result, authorities should decrease the number of flights for the sake of human sustainability.
On the other hand, it is worth remarking that a huge number of people opt for an air trip because comparing to a train trip, this approach allows to save time. It is essential benefit to travellers, since everyone manages own time, preserving it. In my point of view, government should raise awareness of exerting damaging impact on nature. If people have knowledge of it , they will use less air yourneys , choosing another opportunity of their trips. Therefore, without doubts, people are accustomed travel by a plane, but these habits should be compulsory altered.
In conclusion, detrimental environmental effects , the extinction of natural resources are observed , people should strive to improve the situation, imposing people to use other electrical vehicles to get the desired place.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to visit'.
Suggestion: to visit
...ted last two decades, people can afford visiting other countries. Thirdly, the majority ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 937, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...mospheres emissions, since if there are less cars on the roads, there are less harmf...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1007, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...are less harmful gases in the atmosphire . Nevertheless, authorities should also r...
^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'saving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: saving
...g to a train trip, this approach allows to save time. It is essential benefit to travel...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 371, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n nature. If people have knowledge of it , they will use less air yourneys , choos...
^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... of it , they will use less air yourneys , choosing another opportunity of their t...
^^
Line 4, column 49, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...usion, detrimental environmental effects , the extinction of natural resources are...
^^
Line 4, column 100, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nction of natural resources are observed , people should strive to improve the sit...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, thirdly, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2685.0 1615.20841683 166% => OK
No of words: 501.0 315.596192385 159% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35928143713 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01023435654 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 176.041082164 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550898203593 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 839.7 506.74238477 166% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2833967845 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.269230769 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2692307692 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233752547863 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060022619732 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548602318335 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151415533308 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458586370137 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 78.4519038076 181% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.