The pie chart show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where
relevant.
The pie charts compare the generation of electricity in France and Germany with regard to 'all types' and 'renewables' in 2009.
Overall, it can be seen that 'Conventional Thermal' and 'Biomass' were the dominant source of electricity in Germany, whereas 'Nuclear' and 'Hydroelectric' constituted the main root of electricity in France. Another striking feature is that Germany surpassed France in the total production of electricity.
In terms of 'All Types', 'Conventional Thermal' in Germany stood at just under three fifths (59.6%) of the total, while Thermal in France represented only a tenth (10.3%). In contrast, France generated electricity thrice as much as Germany with respect to 'Nuclear' (76% vs 23%). 'Renewables' in Germany produced electricity (17.4%), a bit higher than France (13.7%).
Turning to 'Renewables', 'Biomass' in France generated 8.1% electricity which was nowhere near as close to Germany with 39.3%. However, 'Hydroelectric' remained the top most root of electricity (France) constituting four fifths (80.5%), compared to Germany with only 17.75% 'Hydroelectric'. Wind (10.5%) and Solar (0.9%) sources in France were far lower than Germany with 'Wind' at 36.9% and 'Solar' at 6.1% correspondingly. And there was a marked difference in the net electricity generation with 560 billion kWh (Germany) vs 510 Billion kWh (France).
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 205 200
No. of Characters: 1063 1000
No. of Different Words: 114 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.784 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.185 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.956 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 81 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 63 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 34 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 28 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.277 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.485 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.675 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.159 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while, in contrast, with regard to, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1108.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40487804878 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99626577031 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556097560976 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9740807302 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.8 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253239014515 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120725653471 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763134417839 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196189019469 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812234672074 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.