The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016.

Essay topics:

The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016.

The two pie charts show the amount of money which are utilised and funded in children's Charity in USA by one year in 2016.

overall, it is clear that source of revenue had more percent in donated food by in totalled percentage. however, fundraising and management and general we're less expenditures in their total percentage.

In 2016 the revenue sources were more funded compared to the other contributors. The donated food dominated the all in revenue chat with 86.6%. Also, followed by community contributions with 10.4 percentage.moreover, other income ,government grants and investment income were funds received and it were all below 1 percentage.

the expenditures of the charity could have spend 95.8% on program services which is the highest utilised the money compared to the fund raising, and Management and general. this both had the least percentage in total.

Meanwhile, the total amount of money which were received through funds totalled as 53,561,580 dollars. Nevertheless, the amount in expenditures activities 53,224,896 dollars. Whereas 336,684 dollars was used.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...harity in USA by one year in 2016. overall, it is clear that source of revenue had...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...donated food by in totalled percentage. however, fundraising and management and general...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun expenditures is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...raising and management and general were less expenditures in their total percentage....
^^^^
Line 9, column 230, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...h 10.4 percentage.moreover, other income ,government grants and investment income ...
^^
Line 9, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stment income were funds received and it were all below 1 percentage. the ex...
^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...d it were all below 1 percentage. the expenditures of the charity could have ...
^^^
Line 13, column 44, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
... expenditures of the charity could have spend 95.8% on program services which is the ...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 174, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...nd raising, and Management and general. this both had the least percentage in total....
^^^^
Line 17, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, the amount in expenditures activities 53,224,896 dollars. Whereas 336,684 doll...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, nevertheless, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56547619048 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05601869815 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4774487753 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2727272727 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204102048026 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798066286455 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162381761593 0.0843802449381 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154251910294 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.216105661108 0.0819641961636 264% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.43 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.