Essay topics:
The pie chart shows a comparision of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005
The chart below illustrates a comparison of various type of energy creation in France between 1995 and 2005. Overall, it is evident that the percentage of coal and gas in 1995 was produced similarly in 2005
Having accounted for approximately 30% , both coal production in 1995 and 2005 were the same. Gas production also increased by 1% - a very small number in 2005. Moreover, the creation of nuclear as well as other in 1995 rose to 9% compared to 2005, which were over 11% and 20% respectively
In 1995, petro was produced at more a quarter, 30%, but until 2005 it fell by a minority of 10%
Votes
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... Having accounted for approximately 30% , both coal production in 1995 and 2005 w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, similarly, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 496.0 965.302439024 51% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 107.0 196.424390244 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63551401869 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.2162214527 3.73543355544 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66967747996 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 73.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.682242990654 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 141.3 283.868780488 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5731174716 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 5.23603664747 248% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282304768137 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172852181036 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653048739 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181565259845 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715606326698 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.