The table and pie chart below compare the how many billions of dollar US are used in importing fish and the countries which the countries supply from between 1988 up to 2000.
Overall, it is clearly seem that the cost for importing increase each year. At the same time, Canada prominence in supplying fishes decline as other countries became the main source of supplying.
According to the charts, in 1988 Canada was United States main importer of fishes at a whopping 60% but decreased over the years by 32% in 2000 only reaching up to 28%. In contrast, to China in which its prominence increased over the year from 13% to 30% which is a 17 percent increase. For the rest of the countries US imported from had a fluctuated trend, reaching its peak at 46% in 1992
Regarding the table, the total value in the fishes is 6.57 billion in the year 1988 and started to change from 8.52 to 10.72 billion dollar over the years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
The table and pie chart below compare the how many billions of dollar US are used in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'seemed'.
Suggestion: seemed
... up to 2000. Overall, it is clearly seem that the cost for importing increase ea...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, regarding, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 765.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58083832335 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33913401115 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59880239521 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.2754867828 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8333333333 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259902056982 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118491711696 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101333828719 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160501096169 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0914963730808 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.