In the recent time, many elders need to compete with the younger generations when applying for a job. From what I can see, there are some issues and possible solutions to this development.
There are two problems that will possibly happen. First, is the lack of experiences on the younger people for some of their occupations as most of them do not have a clear understanding on its working. Second, is that because some adults when grew up, they shamelessly just leave their parents to feed and survive on their own. Hence their body is getting worse and his mental capabilities deteriorate, they have a lesser chance of getting employed to the company or organization they are proficient in.
To help tackle some of the unemployment problems, there are some possible solutions that the government should implement. One option is to make a compulsory regulation for these companies to employ more elders which are quite familiar with the job. Another option is to build a retirement house for these people. This will allow them to get proper care and lived happily and peacefully for free of charges as they are funded and supported by the government. This place is of great importance, especially to the elders who had a serious physical or mental disability as they nearly had no chance of getting proper work with high wages.
In conclusion, these people should be more employed as they are valuable assets to our countries and should not be thrown or forgotten. Even though they might not be as bright and active as the current generations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...rents to feed and survive on their own. Hence their body is getting worse and his men...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ey are proficient in. To help tackle some of the unemployment problems, there are some p...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, second, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89772727273 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68598535596 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57196969697 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7166921175 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4615384615 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292739875126 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944337042019 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061698956247 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166344900327 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817429100701 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.