The pie charts below give information about the composition of household rubbish in the United Kingdom in two different years.
The pie charts illustrate of what components the litter in the UK consisted of in 1985 and how the proportion was changed in 2002.
Overall, the household garbage consisted primarily of paper (36%) and kitchen waste (44%) in both 1985 and 2002, correspondingly. Meanwhile, textiles held the last place for both years, with 3% and 2% for each.
As for other leading components, in 1985, organic waste held the second place after paper with 28%, followed with large gap by metals and wood (8% for both). Glass and plastic were the next ingredients, each of them consisted 7% of household garbage. Dust and cinders had one of the least percentages in the compound, the figure achieved 5%.
Regarding 2002 year, miscellaneous was the next leader after kitchen waste, with 17% of all rubbish. Paper slightly less than the prior ingredient took the third place, having 16%. The next material, that was frequently thrown away by households, was paper, taking 7%. The other two rubbish components were wood (6%) and metals (4%).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-10 | AnhHuy | 70 | view |
| 2021-03-11 | fmichela | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | Mustafa443 | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-21 | jimish2300 | 66 | view |
| 2018-11-15 | Fer | 79 | view |
- In the 1950s Torreya taxifolia a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida started to die out No one is sure exactly what caused the decline but chances are good that if nothing is done Torreya will soon become extinct Experts are co 90
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying habits in Australian cities
- The Internet will never replace traditional course books in schools Do you agree or disagree with this prediction 86
- The passage and the lecture is about originality of Jane Austens full length portrait The author of the article shows 3 evidence of it but the speaker convinces that they can be hardly proved 76
- The reading passage and the lecturer discuss the reasons for a decline in the sea otter population The writer states that it is more likely that environmental pollution is the cause of the decline The lecturer disagrees with this point of view and claims 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, second, third, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95321637427 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62701358378 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637426900585 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0621506906 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.7 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0814364008443 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352245125525 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402549632621 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0510922150794 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279393600347 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.