The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make a comparison where relevant.
The diagrams illustrate the share of France energy production in 1995 compared to 2005.
Overall, there was a significantly increasing number in three sources of energy production (gas, coal, nuclear), while the figure for petro observed substantially decreased in 2005. In addition, coal witnessed as the highest proportion of France-produced energy in both years.
In the initial year, coal and gas were reported as the larger share of energy production sources. they accounted for just below bellow a-third. following which, was petro which responsible for 29.27% and, in 2005, it experienced a decline to about a-fifth in the following year. The remaining figure (nuclear and others) formed a small proportion. The former was 6.4% and, the latter shared 4.9% of the total number.
Moving to the second chart, coal and gas were the main energy production sources in 2005. they accounted for 30.93% and 30.31% respectively. The number of energy production by nuclear and other sources rose precisely just below 5% each figure. In contrast, the number of Petrol energy-produced declined to just about 10% compared to that produced in 1995.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ger share of energy production sources. they accounted for just below bellow a-third...
^^^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Following
...ccounted for just below bellow a-third. following which, was petro which responsible for ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 91, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...main energy production sources in 2005. they accounted for 30.93% and 30.31% respect...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, third, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31491712707 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83941352422 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569060773481 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.420097873 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1666666667 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0833333333 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136468609298 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057513735365 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515640838042 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973297478341 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257478883572 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.