The pie chart illustrates the various procedures of dealing with harmful waste products in the Republic of Korea, Sweden, and the UK.
Overall it can be seen that the Republic of Korea mainly recycles its waste and Sweden disposes the harmful waste into underground pits. whereas, in the UK a significant amount of waste goes into incineration.
Firstly, we can observe that 69% of hazardous waste goes into recycling in the Republic of Korea followed by 22% and 9% for below-earth surface and incineration. with respect to Sweden, half of the unwanted products go underground and one quarter for recycling followed by 20% into incineration.
Secondly, in the UK the disposal of dangerous waste follows the opposite pattern as compared to Korea and Sweden. 82% of the rubbish is burned, whereas, only 2% of those waste materials get recycled. The UK has two more ways of disposing of their dangerous waste, first is chemical treatment and the other one is dumping the waste deep into sea, and both of these accounted for 8% separately in overall methods.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...he harmful waste into underground pits. whereas, in the UK a significant amount of wast...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...he harmful waste into underground pits. whereas, in the UK a significant amount of wast...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
...r below-earth surface and incineration. with respect to Sweden, half of the unwanted...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, whereas, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01129943503 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77135776983 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564971751412 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7001228499 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.875 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186591469064 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0907476254972 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586308054427 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132234152176 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635573711192 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.