The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
You should write at least 150 words.
The table indicates the data of people in Melbourne Australia consuming fast food in the past, present, and future.
Overall, It can be seen that there is mainly five most consumed fast food available.
Firstly, as per the table total of 40 units of hamburgers were sold in the past and the same reduced to 38 in the current situations; whereas, In the future, it is expected to reach 51 units by the year 2025. Secondly, Fried chicken is the second most popular item in Melbourne and the number shows that in 2005, 35 units were sold and the same is been increased by 2 units in the present. At the same time, In future, it might reach till 45 units. Lastly, a significant change can be seen with respect to Salad, with only 5 units were sold before and then increased by three times now and again same growth is observed in the future respectively.
On the other hand, the least consumed item is fried rice and the data illustrates that 6 units were sold in 2005. Further, the sales doubled to 9 units and the same can be seen for the future as well. In fact, Noodles also have a similar background to the salad.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the future'?
Suggestion: In the future
...units in the present. At the same time, In future, it might reach till 45 units. Lastly, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, well, whereas, in fact, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43961352657 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32644686467 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545893719807 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9951737501 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.111111111 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3333333333 5.23603664747 255% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0921669188501 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490202019166 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589937160738 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0922914855424 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620665204335 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.