The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.
These pie graphs compare the disposal methods of hazardous waste products in three different nations-Republic of Korea, Sweden and the United Kingdom.
Republic of Korea and Sweden show a similar way on disposing of hazardous waste. It is accounted at 69% of this waste is recycled in Korea while it is a quarter in Sweden. This is followed by 22% of these dangerous waste goods buried underground in Korea which is almost three times less than Sweden (55%). The rest of the dangerous waste goods is caught out in incineration which is a way to burn the waste by fire in Korea and Sweden, at 9% for the former and 20% for the latter.
In contrast, the United Kingdom indicates a completely different solution to deal with dangerous waste. The remarkable method is burying the waste underground which occupied the largest proportion at 82%. The rest of the waste is dealt with chemical treatment, dumpling at sea and incineration at 8%, 8% and 2% respectively.
Overall, it is clear that although recycling is the main method to deal with dangerous waste good, bury underground the major way in other nations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92105263158 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78641341566 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521052631579 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5409320548 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.888888889 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225091873985 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968999306761 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390785488118 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141953439037 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182287937721 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.