The shown pie charts compare and contrast eight most typical upsides and downsides of Bowen Island. The figures are collected via a survey of this island’s visitors and measured in percentage.
Overall, high living expense is the most common disadvantage while food quality is the least. Meanwhile, in terms of positive sides, the largest proportion of visitors comes to their satisfaction in the local and sights whereas good accommodation and culture share the smallest parts.
As can be seen from the first chart, half of the visitors are not satisfied with the island’s high cost of living, accounting for the majority of the chart. This figure doubles the second most common factor which is about the lack of leisure activities. Weather and food quality share the least proportions, with 15% and 10% respectively.
As the second chart shows, over two-fifths of travelers are most interested in the local residents, 7% more than the satisfaction with the scenery. The proportion of visitors who are fond of places to stay stands at 12% and is at the third, only 1% more than that of culture.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03825136612 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71103244455 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612021857923 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6937216365 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.444444444 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190459114754 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760017369302 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538439337738 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114959303759 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608249732916 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.